![]() Member States must, in particular, ensure that television broadcasters under their jurisdiction comply with the conditions With Community law, creates an obligation for the Member States to safeguard the legal consequences of those measures. Triggered by a Commission decision declaring measures taken by a Member State in accordance with Article 3a(1) thereof compatible Laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, The mechanism of mutual recognition, provided for by Article 3a(3) of Directive 89/552 on the coordination of certain provisions Justified on grounds of overriding reasons of public interest and in keeping with the principle of proportionality – Indirectġ. Freedom to provide services – Television broadcasting activities – Directive 89/552 – Restrictions imposed by a Member State Public interest – Assessment in the light of general principles of law – Measures infringing fundamental rights not acceptableħ. ![]() Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Restrictions – Justification on grounds of overriding reasons of Freedom to provide services – Television broadcasting activities – Directive 89/552 – National procedures for determiningĦ. (European Parliament and Council Directive 97/36, recital 18 Council Directive 89/552, Art. Freedom to provide services – Television broadcasting activities – Directive 89/552 – Events of major importance (European Parliament and Council Directive 97/36, recitals 18 and 21 Council Directive 89/552, Art. Restrictions on the exercise of fundamental freedoms established by European Union law – Justification – Guarantee of right Freedom to provide services – Television broadcasting activities – Directive 89/552 – Possibility for Member States to impose Rights to an event covered by that decision – Applicant identifiable at the time of adoption of that decision – Applicantģ. To Article 3a of Directive 89/552 compatible with Community law – Action brought by the original holder of the broadcasting Individually concerned by a general decision – Conditions – Commission decision declaring national measures adopted pursuant Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Possibility of being 263, fourth para., TFEU Council Directive 89/552, Art. Law – No discretion for Member States – Action brought by the original holder of the broadcasting rights to an event coveredīy that decision – Whether directly concerned – Commission decision declaring national measures adopted pursuant to Article 3a of Directive 89/552 compatible with Community Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned (Television broadcasting – Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC – Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom society – Football World Cup – Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law – Statement of reasons – Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC – Right to property)ġ. Television broadcasting - Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom society - Football World Cup - Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law - Statement of reasons - Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property.įédération internationale de football association (FIFA) Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011.įédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v European Commission. # Television broadcasting - Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom society - Football World Cup - Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law - Statement of reasons - Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property. # Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v European Commission. Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |